Nebraska earned their way into not having a case for 6* when they had that what just happened to us loss against Washington.
OSU should still be a 6*
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2...les_violations
There is a table list at the end of the article regarding violations between 2001-2010 that were actually found out.
Honestly, it seems like every top programs all around the country have had some sort of problem. My argument being unless you plan on dropping a school's prestige every time they had a major violation then you should just keep the current system.
Oregon has some smoke apparently
USC got hammered
Ohio State will get hammered
Auburn has a small fire nobody wants to pay attention to
Connecticut got punished
North Carolina's season was ruined
and it goes on and on
NCAA violations in my mind are often so min-numbingly silly that I often don't feel they should happen in the first place. A prime example being the Oklahoma State receiver(Dez Bryant?) losing his senior season over lunch. I could care less if he lied about it because some NCAA investigator scared the crap out of him by not explaining things properly causing him to lie.
Telling 18-22 year olds not to take free stuff and then punishing the schools when they do is misplaced justice. These same 18-22 year olds know that all they have to do is make it past college and the NCAA can't touch them. Generally the NCAA doesn't even find out unless some curious local reporter finds their next big break.
Honestly, I feel an NFL developmental league that can take kids straight out of high school has been long overdue especially for the kids that get thrown under the bus because they don't have the grades for college but may have the talent for football. Let the kids who want to follow the rules, graduate, and play for a college while taking meaningful classes do so. I am so tired of watching an endless procession of schools get in trouble over "student-athletes" who wouldn't even be in college if there was a viable alternative to a college system that isn't meant for everyone. I could care less if it hurts the quality of the college game since it might actually get back some of that amateurism everybody seems so fond of.
I'm sorry but when some college teams have been consistently drawing more fans than NFL teams then I really feel amateurism went out the window a long time ago. Let the bigger university athletic departments pay their players, and throw the majority of the NCAA rule book out the window. If the smaller schools can't compete, and can't even make a profit then what the heck are they doing spending that much on football teams to play at the FBS level to begin with.
I could care less if these kids get free stuff either if other people want to give them free stuff. I haven't heard of anybody losing an academic scholarship for accepting a free tat because it violates scholastic amateurism. Honestly, I respect sweater vest now more than ever before because he essentially told the NCAA to stuff it with their ridiculous rules, and went out of his way to protect the people in the NCAA system who matter most...the players. The same players who are now most likely going to be robbed of what otherwise might have been fantastic seasons over tattoo's and car deals that have been declared illegal by some over-reaching entity that is trying to control who these athletes talk to, party with, live with, work with, and study with. Goodness, I bet the NCAA is 2 years away from implanting chips into athletes so that university compliance departments can keep tabs on everything they do and say.
Universities compete for good students with academic scholarships, and then expect them to be reasonable and get good grades.
I would expect athletic scholarships to be given to good athletes with the expectations that they get passing grades and give a good athletic performance of themselves.
Instead we get an endless series of rules and regulations designed around controlling every aspect of life. Honestly, even if all the boosters for all the different schools lined up and competed over athletes with different benefits I am willing to bet the athletes would still be reasonably distributed among the various schools as long as roster limitations and transfer rules were kept in effect. (reasonably being described as similar to what we see now which is Alabama sitting on a roster of 4 and 5 star recruits, and Eastern Michigan scraping the bottom of the barrel.)