Plodding along with my Cubs fictional Bacon team, this game continues to thrive.
I'm bottom 10 in hitting, top 5 in pitching (its EARLY).
On that note, I'm not saying this set is flawless for anyone who plays it- we've all got a skill gap. However, I have to urge almost unfathomable levels of patience for all of those using these in a franchise. 25 games is not a sample, 50 games is not a sample. Heck even 100 games in and your just starting to see averages be balanced appropriately.
I'll share a story from 20', with my fictional Tigers. I had a platoon bat, Caleb Green, who had 1/3 of his entire years production in the first 30 games of the season. He was just RED hot, mashing shots left and right. By seasons end, he was exactly who we thought he was! (Shoutout Denny Green). A middling hitter, who offered something vs. lefties in a platoon role.
What I'm asking is not realistic for most, but those that trust this set and the process behind it, stick with it, I beg you!
Yes, there are outlier stats that we simply can't line up to historical averages (BB issues, GIDP as example), but man oh man over 162 games I'm not sure another set on OS delivers like Josh's.
In my brief experience with the real SDS or Ridin rosters, you're just not going to have as good of a game as Bacon's set offers with these sliders. Just my $0.02.
Comment