</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
SoMiss2000 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Taur3asi3 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
SportsmanTO said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Taur3asi3 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
SoMiss2000 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Taur3asi3 said:
It doesnt really matter to me but it DOES matter to corporate america a good amount
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">why?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Because its alot easier to sell a cornfed white boy like Keith Van Horn then a tattooed thug like Kenyon Martin to white america
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Not really, In the 80s Magic was a far more viable asset rather then Larry Bird who was too bland to be truly marketed. Most of the white players i've seen in the NBA are devoid of true personality.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Magic wasnt a tattoed thug either im talking about present day NBA
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">so K-Mart is a thug? Does having tatoos make you a thug?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Don't forget, you have to be black too. They have white guys with tattos but no one says anything about them being "thugs".
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Again, see Bill Laimbeer. You don't have to be black to be a thug.
Comment