Xbox One

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ubernoob
    ****
    • Jul 2004
    • 15522

    #4501
    Originally posted by Dos_Santos
    Without getting into exclusives and small technical differences, what is the justification for the extra $100?

    Is it Kinect addition only?

    Or is there an actual functional benefit that the Xbox One will provide over the PS4 (like tv integration or whatnot)?
    They charge what they think they can get away with while maintaining the highest return possible. We saw the same thing with the ps3 this gen.

    Also, to those thinking that this is a bad move for future pricing reasons I have a question for you.

    Why do you think Steam-like sales would be possible? MS has been on record saying game prices would be 59.99. MS/Sony cannot sell games at a discount online and be full price at retail. Do you know how pissed off the Walmarts and Targets of the world will be?

    Also, realize that Steam isn't doing sales out of the goodness of their hearts. Steam is competing with Amazon, Green man gaming, GameFly, GameStop, GoG and others for your digital distribution dollars. Who would MS/Sony compete with on the digital distribution front? Nobody. They would have a monopoly on distribution due to the closed nature of the system. Game budgets keep going up and up, prices aren't going to magically drop. We're lucky they are staying at $60.

    If you have no competition, you don't magically pass savings on to the consumer. You sit there and enjoy the extra boost in revenue. It's business 101.

    Where (and why) do those people think that going digital will cause price drops?
    bad

    Comment

    • ghettogeeksta
      Banned
      • Sep 2011
      • 2632

      #4502
      Re: Xbox One

      I don't understand why they had to take away Family Sharing for those who choose to buy digital only and I don't understand why they had to take away the 24 hr check-ins. Why not make every game come with a code, and give players a choice on rather to play Offline (don't enter code, you still can play online but don't have to be connected to do so) or Online (enter code and be subject to a 24hr check in.)
      Guess Im going to GameStop to cancel my BF4 and Ryse pre-orders, because im going digital only this gen.

      Comment

      • Sandman42
        Hall Of Fame
        • Aug 2004
        • 15186

        #4503
        Re: Xbox One

        Originally posted by RJTurneR
        Put it this way.. MS clearly know something we don't, otherwise they wouldn't of considered it an advancement themselves.

        That's telling me something..
        They were just trying to rush everyone into the all digital age. It'll eventually happen, but to try and force it was a dumb move. Leave it like it is and it will eventually die off if digital sales prove to be the way the masses want, like Steam did for PC gaming.
        Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

        Comment

        • MizzouBravesFan
          MVP
          • Mar 2004
          • 2489

          #4504
          Re: Xbox One

          Wonder if they'll go the full monty and drop the price now...even if its by $50 or so.
          Patrick Mahomes > God

          Comment

          • Tyrant8RDFL
            MVP
            • Feb 2004
            • 3563

            #4505
            Re: Xbox One

            Originally posted by bcruise
            It still costs $100 more. That's not a drop in the bucket for a lot of people.

            I think it will balance things out more, keep the people who were jumping ship to PS4 because of the DRM policies. I don't really think it gives MS a clear edge.
            I agree $499 is a lot of money and even with out all the restriction the price point will still play a big role in which system gamers will purchase.

            Microsoft in my opinion made a great move. They got blasted for the direction they wanted to layout the XBOX One , and they changed it and did this very quickly.

            Now if the Kinect is just a novelty piece I would suggest that they make a second sku for the XBOX one without the Kinect and sell it for $399. That would help them regain more of the customers that they lost. At this point they only gained some back, but not all with the price point at $499.



            Originally posted by RJTurneR
            In a way I agree. I think the change is welcome by the majority though.. Obviously.

            The question that now comes to mind for me is.. What next? And I'm not talking about the X1 either. MS clearly wanted to get the jump on making games and content digital, as that is most likely the future. Whether or not it is too early for it, we don't know. That future lies in the hands of the companies such as Sony and MS, as one day, things will change.

            None of us, as far as I know, are aware of how much MS invested into this idea. The damage may have already been done on the consumer end, but does this also to damage to their plans in the future?

            Also, I do not see any reverse on the Kinect bundle, but maybe a possible price drop, but not too the PS4 level, it will remain the more expensive one I think. MS can't back out on two of their plans now after this, nothing worse than looking like a fool in the public eye.
            Even if they create a second sku for the XBOX one excluding the Kinect, and selling it for $399? You dont think that can happen?

            I feel it will happen if the pre-orders numbers are not to their liking after making this announcement.
            Simply *Magic* Just click the link and Watch :)
            http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2043715147

            Comment

            • Boltman
              L.A. to S.D. to HI
              • Mar 2004
              • 18283

              #4506
              Re: Xbox One

              Originally posted by Flawless
              Sources indicate Microsoft is going to move away from what's caused the company so much headache.

              UPDATED: Microsoft has confirmed these policy changes are happening.
              --
              The tug-of-war between Microsoft and Sony just got more interesting. Multiple sources inform me Microsoft will announce what amounts to a complete reversal on its DRM policies for Xbox One today.

              What does this mean?

              • No more always online requirement
              • The console no longer has to check in every 24 hours
              • All game discs will work on Xbox One as they do on Xbox 360
              • An Internet connection is only required when initially setting up the console
              • All downloaded games will function the same when online or offline
              • No additional restrictions on trading games or loaning discs
              • Region locks have been dropped



              Originally posted by aholbert32
              This. Give me all these things and MS would have my money right now.

              Originally posted by TheBuddyHobbs
              Take away DRM, check in's and forced Kinect and I am not complaining at all. I would happily live in Xbox One and PS4 land.


              Go ahead and pre order your XBOX ONE now guys.



              EDIT:
              I probably should have seen that there was quite a few posts after the initial one with the bomb dropping news I quoted before I replied.
              Last edited by Boltman; 06-19-2013, 07:59 PM.

              Comment

              • RJTurneR
                MVP
                • Aug 2010
                • 2183

                #4507
                Re: Xbox One

                They were just trying to rush everyone into the all digital age. It'll eventually happen, but to try and force it was a dumb move. Leave it like it is and it will eventually die off if digital sales prove to be the way the masses want, like Steam did for PC gaming.
                They had the right idea in mind, and the approach of "Why do it later when you can do it now" was a risk. Personally I think if they had of kept it in place, I think the X1 from release onwards would by default have the upper hand over the next decade, purely because in time majority of games will be digital.
                Last edited by RJTurneR; 06-19-2013, 07:45 PM.

                Comment

                • m1ke_nyc
                  10
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 3243

                  #4508
                  Re: Xbox One

                  With Amazon getting more inventory wonder if they will start upgrading some of the later orders to release day shipping ?
                  It’s easier to do the right thing, than to explain why you didn’t.

                  Comment

                  • SinisterAlex
                    Canadian eh?
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 4551

                    #4509
                    Re: Xbox One

                    Originally posted by aholbert32
                    Still wont get one at launch but will definitely get one later because of the changes. Most of the launch next gen games are cross-platform and I still have a TON of games to play on the 360. At launch, I'll only need one next-gen platform so I'll go with the cheaper one right now.

                    With that said, I'm proud that gamers were able to force MS' hand and get them to change its policy. Power of the preorder.
                    I agree with the cross platform games. All the games I play on my 360 currently, I can play on the PS3.

                    I'm looking 2-3 years down the road. I honestly see the PS4 having the better exclusives, hands down. I will get an Xbox One eventually, just not at launch.

                    The damage has already been done for me.
                    Xbox LIVE GT: oALEXtheGREATo
                    PSN ID: oALEXtheGREATo

                    Comment

                    • Detroitfan4life1993
                      Rookie
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 485

                      #4510
                      Re: Xbox One

                      I wont be getting a console untill christmas so that will give me a month or so to see what both console are like and what people are thinking. Still leaning towards ps4 tho.
                      Psn: DiehardDetroit

                      Comment

                      • Skyboxer
                        Donny Baseball!
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 20302

                        #4511
                        Re: Xbox One

                        Originally posted by DonkeyJote
                        Just out if curiosity, what are people's problem with kinect being included? I don't play Kinect myself, but it's inclusion isn't an issue for me at all.

                        Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
                        For me it's about clutter. I hate having something I don't want taking up space.
                        Joshua:
                        "D.O.D. pension files indicate current mailing as: Dr. Robert Hume,
                        a.k.a. Stephen W. Falken, 5 Tall Cedar Road, Goose Island, Oregon"


                        Skyboxer OS TWITCH
                        STEAM
                        PSN: Skyboxeros
                        SWITCH 8211-0709-4612
                        XBOX Skyboxer OS

                        Comment

                        • RJTurneR
                          MVP
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 2183

                          #4512
                          Re: Xbox One

                          Even if they create a second sku for the XBOX one excluding the Kinect, and selling it for $399? You dont think that can happen?

                          I feel it will happen if the pre-orders numbers are not to their liking after making this announcement.
                          I think theres a chance it may happen, but MS have to balance things out. The policy change has most certainly put a positive outlook on the X1. But don't get too hasty.

                          MS have to tread carefully. It's a balancing act between the consumer, money, and the publics opinion. Going back on the Kinect idea is, as far as I know, actually quite difficult. Why? As my knowledge goes the X1 is designed to use Kinect, and not as an optional feature like the 360. That would in turn surely mean having to put a delay on manufacturing and re-programming the X1? That's not an overnight job, and they can't miss out on Winter sales.

                          In regards to a price drop, it would be welcomed by many. But I can't see them equaling the PS4 price. It would essentially make them look like fools to the media and the public eye because again they would be backtracking, admitting they were wrong. Yes they want to make sales but they also don't want bad PR.

                          Money. Consumer views. Publics eye. Each has to be balanced out.

                          Comment

                          • Kevin26385
                            EA Game Changer
                            • May 2004
                            • 5147

                            #4513
                            Re: Xbox One

                            The Xbox One Just Got Way Worse, And It's Our Fault
                            Microsoft just announced that its much-maligned DRM policies won't look at all like they originally had originally been described. They're going to more


                            Great article

                            Comment

                            • ubernoob
                              ****
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 15522

                              #4514
                              Re: Xbox One

                              Originally posted by RJTurneR
                              They had the right idea in mind, and the approach of "Why do it later when you can do it now" was a risk. Personally I think if they had of kept it in place, I think the X1 from release onwards would by default have the upper hand over the next decade, purely because in time majority of games will be digital.
                              The majority of games ARE digital right now.

                              There's nothing stopping you from purchasing digitally on release dates.

                              Again, that article supports the fallacy that MS will willingly give money away when there is no competition for distribution on consoles.

                              It has nothing to do with DRM. GoG has sales all the time (they are having a huge one right now) and their whole shtick is #NoDRM. It's even the name of their sale.

                              Sales don't happen when one company runs everything, hence the monopoly laws we have here in the US. Gaming consoles going purely digital will not see prices drop. MS/Sony could charge whatever they wanted in a digital world when they have no competition. You don't get ahead in business by giving away money.
                              Last edited by ubernoob; 06-19-2013, 07:58 PM.
                              bad

                              Comment

                              • AirLobo23
                                Banned
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 1617

                                #4515
                                Re: Xbox One

                                Originally posted by XtremeDunkz
                                Sigh, just another classic example of customers scared of change constantly crying holds back advancement. I wish MS would have stuck to their guns.
                                Amen!!!!!!! Sorry for all the exclamation points but i'm required to type 10 characters and now i felt the need to explain all the exclamation points.

                                Comment

                                Working...