2019 Offseason Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DieHardYankee26
    BING BONG
    • Feb 2008
    • 10178

    #556
    Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

    Originally posted by ojandpizza
    Renouncing him would give up his bird rights, but singing him after they've already signed other players wouldn't, or would it?
    They can't afford 2 max contracts without renouncing him. I'm pretty sure you give up bird rights for good, doesn't make sense to be able to give them up and then just use them anyway, but I'm not 100% on that.
    Originally posted by G Perico
    If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
    I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
    In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
    The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

    Comment

    • Yeah...THAT Guy
      Once in a Lifetime Memory
      • Dec 2006
      • 17294

      #557
      Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

      Originally posted by ojandpizza
      I guess I'm a bit confused on the timing aspect of all this. DLo's contract is up this year, is there any sort of rule that says he has to be signed or renounced first? Like before signing other free agents? Because if not couldn't they sign their two guys and then offer DLo his new deal using bird rights?

      He has a cap hold of $21 million. If they renounce the cap hold then they can’t go over the cap to re-sign him and therefore can’t sign him in addition to two max guys.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      NFL: Bills
      NBA: Bucks
      MLB: Cubs
      NCAA: Syracuse
      Soccer: USMNT/DC United

      PSN: ButMyT-GunDont

      Comment

      • NYJets
        Hall Of Fame
        • Jul 2002
        • 18637

        #558
        Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

        Originally posted by Majingir
        Lol, the Atlantic is suddenly the powerhouse division in the east. Except the Knicks.
        Maybe let them actually sign someone first?
        Originally posted by Jay Bilas
        The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

        Comment

        • ojandpizza
          Hall Of Fame
          • Apr 2011
          • 29807

          #559
          Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

          Originally posted by DieHardYankee26
          They can't afford 2 max contracts without renouncing him. I'm pretty sure you give up bird rights for good, doesn't make sense to be able to give them up and then just use them anyway, but I'm not 100% on that.
          Originally posted by Yeah...THAT Guy
          He has a cap hold of $21 million. If they renounce the cap hold then they can’t go over the cap to re-sign him and therefore can’t sign him in addition to two max guys.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          I was missing the part that he had a cap hold, didn't assume that was going to effect their available cap since he will no longer be under contract and signing a new contract..

          So how is that any different than having a team option? He's no longer under contract but has a cap hold that prevents them from using money that could theoretically end up being bird rights?

          Need to take that out with the next CBA.

          Comment

          • georgiafan
            Hall Of Fame
            • Jul 2002
            • 11112

            #560
            Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

            Looks like it’s a legit 1st round coming to Atlanta lottery protected for 20,21 and 22. It becomes two 2nd after 22 (per Zach Lowe)


            Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
            Retro Redemption - Starting over with a oldschool PowerBone Offense

            My Youtube

            Twitter

            PS5 ID = BubbasCruise

            Comment

            • NYJets
              Hall Of Fame
              • Jul 2002
              • 18637

              #561
              Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

              Originally posted by ojandpizza
              I was missing the part that he had a cap hold, didn't assume that was going to effect their available cap since he will no longer be under contract and signing a new contract..

              So how is that any different than having a team option? He's no longer under contract but has a cap hold that prevents them from using money that could theoretically end up being bird rights?

              Need to take that out with the next CBA.
              Everyone with a contract expiring has a cap hold. Point of the bird rights is to give you a chance to keep your own players, not go on a spending spree and then keep your own players
              Originally posted by Jay Bilas
              The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

              Comment

              • Yeah...THAT Guy
                Once in a Lifetime Memory
                • Dec 2006
                • 17294

                #562
                Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                Originally posted by ojandpizza
                I was missing the part that he had a cap hold, didn't assume that was going to effect their available cap since he will no longer be under contract and signing a new contract..



                So how is that any different than having a team option? He's no longer under contract but has a cap hold that prevents them from using money that could theoretically end up being bird rights?



                Need to take that out with the next CBA.

                It’s not a team option because they can’t keep him for $21 million if they so choose.

                The cap holds are there specifically for the purpose that you’re saying it needs to be taken out for. If there were no cap holds, a team could line up all of their contracts so that they have bird rights for their entire roster and also have the full $109 million salary cap available to sign free agents. So in a world without cap holds, the Warriors could theoretically have lined things up so they could sign Kawhi, Kyrie, and Butler and then re-sign KD, Steph, Klay, and Draymond if they wanted to.


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                NFL: Bills
                NBA: Bucks
                MLB: Cubs
                NCAA: Syracuse
                Soccer: USMNT/DC United

                PSN: ButMyT-GunDont

                Comment

                • jfsolo
                  Live Action, please?
                  • May 2003
                  • 12965

                  #563
                  Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                  Originally posted by ojandpizza
                  I was missing the part that he had a cap hold, didn't assume that was going to effect their available cap since he will no longer be under contract and signing a new contract..

                  So how is that any different than having a team option? He's no longer under contract but has a cap hold that prevents them from using money that could theoretically end up being bird rights?

                  Need to take that out with the next CBA.
                  Cap holds aren't going anywhere, and they shouldn't. Cap space comes from renouncing players. If teams didn't have to renounce players to create space then they could just double dip and sign players from other teams and then resign their own players as well. This would literally make the Salary Cap null and void. Super team like the Warriors would be the norm.
                  Jordan Mychal Lemos
                  @crypticjordan

                  Do this today: Instead of $%*#!@& on a game you're not going to play or movie you're not going to watch, say something good about a piece of media you're excited about.

                  Do the same thing tomorrow. And the next. Now do it forever.

                  Comment

                  • Fresh Tendrils
                    Strike Hard and Fade Away
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 36131

                    #564
                    Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                    Dang. Little bit of success and Maj starts throwing punches.



                    Comment

                    • DieHardYankee26
                      BING BONG
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 10178

                      #565
                      Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                      Maj can't throw ****, the division was already that way this year. But don't let us get good...
                      Originally posted by G Perico
                      If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
                      I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
                      In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
                      The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

                      Comment

                      • Majingir
                        Moderator
                        • Apr 2005
                        • 47632

                        #566
                        Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                        Originally posted by DieHardYankee26
                        Maj can't throw ****, the division was already that way this year. But don't let us get good...
                        I meant it more like 4 of top 5 teams in east could be from 1 division. Nets were 6 this year, but 42 wins as 6 seed seemed unusually low.

                        Comment

                        • OSUFan_88
                          Outback Jesus
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 25642

                          #567
                          Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                          Nets and Cavs sure would make a lot of sense. Cavs need a lot of youth to rebuild and the Nets need to get one of the top prospects in this draft.

                          5 for 8 and 17 or something along those lines would make me very happy.
                          Too Old To Game Club

                          Urban Meyer is lol.

                          Comment

                          • georgiafan
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 11112

                            #568
                            Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                            Originally posted by OSUFan_88
                            Nets and Cavs sure would make a lot of sense. Cavs need a lot of youth to rebuild and the Nets need to get one of the top prospects in this draft.

                            5 for 8 and 17 or something along those lines would make me very happy.
                            That’s definitely possible as clearly 6 rookies won’t be drafted. It doesn’t look like 3 or 4 will be traded till all the AD drama is behind so that puts Cavs in a good spot for a trade. Atlanta would likely trade up for Cam or Culver.

                            I also think maybe Atlanta tries to use the 3 2nds and cap space to move up a few spots. I still wouldn’t rule out a trade down.
                            Retro Redemption - Starting over with a oldschool PowerBone Offense

                            My Youtube

                            Twitter

                            PS5 ID = BubbasCruise

                            Comment

                            • TheFinalEvent97
                              MVP
                              • Jul 2016
                              • 1519

                              #569
                              Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                              Originally posted by ojandpizza
                              I was missing the part that he had a cap hold, didn't assume that was going to effect their available cap since he will no longer be under contract and signing a new contract..

                              So how is that any different than having a team option? He's no longer under contract but has a cap hold that prevents them from using money that could theoretically end up being bird rights?

                              Need to take that out with the next CBA.
                              Its to stop teams becoming ridiculously stacked, for example KD and Klay's contracts expire at the end of this season. Without cap holds the Warriors would have significant cap space to use then re-sign them..
                              Last edited by TheFinalEvent97; 06-06-2019, 08:31 PM.

                              Comment

                              • ojandpizza
                                Hall Of Fame
                                • Apr 2011
                                • 29807

                                #570
                                Re: 2019 Offseason Thread

                                Originally posted by TheFinalEvent97
                                Its to stop teams becoming ridiculously stacked, for example KD and Klay's contracts expire at the end of this season. Without cap holds the Warriors would have significant cap space to use then re-sign them..


                                But for a player who hasn’t already earned a max deal it seems a bit unfair to teams who want to keep young players have to use so much to retain them.

                                I worded my other post a bit weird. I didn’t mean that there shouldn’t be cap holds period, I was more so looking at it along the lines of a player who made 7 mil this year is going have a cap hold of 20 something mil.


                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                                Comment

                                Working...