Apparently, bent grass or newly laid fine fescue works just fine. Or, just having poa greens (as a lot of west coast courses do) is apparently fine. I think it was just the mix of fescue and poa that caused most of the problems with green-to-green consistency.
I don't think it's a problem to have Even or somewhere around that score be the winning score, even with today's technology. If I recall correctly, I think Justin Rose won 2 years ago at Merion with +1, so it's not about distance (Merion is tiny). Actually, if you think about it, the longer you make the course, the more it favors the power hitters. If you want to keep up with technology (or eliminate it from the equation completely), you should set the courses up shorter so that it provides no real advantage to be able to hit it 345 off the tee. For example, a 445 yd par 4 with a hard dogleg at the 300-yd mark basically eliminates the difference between a guy who hits it 350 off the tee and a guy who hits it 290.
I think the issue is how that winning score is achieved: if the course is playing with tight fairways, greens are rolled to pavement levels of speed, and the rough is grown out to be extremely penal, to me that's legitimate. But if you artificially gerrymander a tailor-made tournament course so that you're manufacturing even par rounds based on the gimmicks, well, that seems less legitimate to me.
Comment