|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's close, but yes.
But if all that matters are wins and stats aren't important, then why is Tim Tebow sitting on the bench on a terrible team? That line of thinking is incredibly flawed.
Joe Flacco is a solid quarterback, no doubt. But he isn't in the same galaxy as the top four guys at his position: Brady, Brees, P. Manning and Rodgers. Hell, a healthy Roethlisberger is a better player, too.
This guy absolutely does not deserve 20 million dollars a year and I have yet to see a compelling argument that disputes that.
If I'm Baltimore, I low ball him on a deal (like 6/90) knowing he isn't going to accept it and then franchise tag him for 2013. Chances are, the Ravens won't win the Super Bowl again next year (let's face it, the odds are extremely against repeating in today's NFL) and Baltimore will have more leverage in locking him up long term next year. It might not be the "nicest" way to handle the situation, but this is a business at the end of the day and investing 20 million dollars a year in a quarterback that will never be one of the top five best in the league at any point in his career isn't good for business. Especially when you have an entire defense to rebuild!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's make the Tebow comparison (since you REALLY want to go there, lmao).
In 2011 Tebow completed 47% of his passes for 1729 yards and 12 TDs. His QBR was
29.9. His stats are insanely abysmal, and his team's record was 8-8. He was then traded and couldn't beat out Marc Sanchez in practice while putting up even worse stats when he did get in the game. In the post season his team is 1-1 and he completed 40% of his passes for an average of 226 yards/game... and a QBR again of 29.9.
I don't think listing 5 years of Flacco's stats is necessary to say this is a ridiculous comparison to say "if stats don't matter then why is Tebow not starting somewhere" even if you want to look at regular season wins and loses. This is the definition of a reach.
BTW, you may want to go take a look at Big Ben's first 5 years... hell you can look at his entire career. The Steelers have played a similar style as Baltimore and his stats reflect it.
While you're at it, go take a look at Brady's first 5 or 6 years before the NE defense began to fall off a bit and they had to lean more on his arm. Other than TDs, his numbers look pretty similar.
Is Flacco the next Tom Brady? Probably not, and he doesn't even deserve to have that question asked seriously at this point. But lets not act like teams aren't trying to win more than pile up stats, and that stats aren't effected by the team's style of play... or that there aren't QBs that YOU mentioned who played in similar systems who put up similar stats while winning games (which Flacco has done since day one), and Tebow is very, very, very far from deserving to be mentioned in a debate involving any of them.