The strongest punishment to side sway spam

[magx950]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

You're playing ranked against people of a similar skill level to you though.

did you upload the vid? i didn't see it

[Thetruth11]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

We can get some more fights in if you want. Just take it to the fight club thread.

I won't be home for about 3 hrs I'm not worried.

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

[Serengeti1]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

I won't be home for about 3 hrs I'm not worried.

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

Okay. Try to keep the emotional outbursts to a minimum then.

[aholbert32]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

This is your decision mate. If you want to have a disadvantage that is your prerogative. I don't understand why you're complaining about it. I think the skill vs realism thing is currently fine how it is.

I actually had a discussion with a gamechanger about this a while back. He wanted to be able to use Saki in ranked but his grappling is so poor it would equal an auto loss at the top levels. The was asking for a grappling buff (nothing huge) so that he would be more viable at that level.

My response was that Saki had shown any grappling skills (yet) so buffing him wouldnt be realistic and it would be unfair to rank him over fighters who while not great at grappling have shown more skill there.

My view is that everyone shouldnt be viable at the top levels of ranked. Why? Because people are simply looking to win at that level and will always gravitate toward the best fighters. Now there should always be a group of fighters who are viable at each weight class but everyone shouldnt.

[Thetruth11]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

Okay. Try to keep the emotional outbursts to a minimal then.

No emotion just facts
People cry about flaws but when somebody states the problem behind it that's not to their liking they makeup bs

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

[Serengeti1]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

I actually had a discussion with a gamechanger about this a while back. He wanted to be able to use Saki in ranked but his grappling is so poor it would equal an auto loss at the top levels. The was asking for a grappling buff (nothing huge) so that he would be more viable at that level.

My response was that Saki had shown any grappling skills (yet) so buffing him wouldnt be realistic and it would be unfair to rank him over fighters who while not great at grappling have shown more skill there.

My view is that everyone shouldnt be viable at the top levels of ranked. Why? Because people are simply looking to win at that level and will always gravitate toward the best fighters. Now there should always be a group of fighters who are viable at each weight class but everyone shouldnt.

100% agree. In quick fight... You can beat anyone with CM Punk. In Division 4... You can use lower level fighters and win often. If you're using a bad fighter in the highest division on the game... That is entirely on you if you're struggling. You should be.

No emotion just facts
People cry about flaws but when somebody states the problem behind it that's not to their liking they makeup bs

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

Bro... You literally said you beat up the Diaz brothers irl. Stop. lol.

[Thetruth11]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

100% agree. In quick fight... You can beat anyone with CM Punk. In Division 4... You can use lower level fighters and win often. If you're using a bad fighter in the highest division on the game... That is entirely on you if you're struggling. You should be.



Bro... You literally said you beat up the Diaz brothers irl. Stop. lol.

It was sparring but ok whatever I'm on topic you clearly are hurt about being wrong earlier it's just a game bud
We all the messed up stats and perks make fighters unusable
Why is osp chin the same as rampage

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

[Freshly Baked Gregg]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

I’m so sick of uppercutting people as they duck and hooking the as they sway and doing no substantial damage.

Meanwhile they’re attacking the body when I miss because of their sways and my stamina gets reduced to nothing.


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[Serengeti1]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

It was sparring but ok whatever I'm on topic you clearly are hurt about being wrong earlier it's just a game bud
We all the messed up stats and perks make fighters unusable
Why is osp chin the same as rampage

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

Wrong? Your opinion is that I'm wrong. That doesn't make it so. That's not how it works. I'm not going back and forth on it again in this thread. Especially when it's already been established you don't know what you're talking about and have spoken about beating up UFC fighters and boxing champions lol.

There is a side to your argument. You just don't know what it is. Leave it to the people who understand what it is man.

[Thetruth11]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

Wrong? Your opinion is that I'm wrong. That doesn't make it so. That's not how it works. I'm not going back and forth on it again in this thread. Especially when it's already been established you don't know what you're talking about and have spoken about beating up UFC fighters and boxing champions lol.

There is a side to your argument. You just don't know what it is. Leave it to the people who understand what it is man.

Oh yup your mentally challenged you can't even read never said I've beat up anybody but ok
I know for a fact your fight iq is terrible by your suggestions.
Like I said people who know me seen footage
I'm not going back and forth with you clown.


Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

[SMOKEZERO]

The strongest punishment to side sway spam

I actually had a discussion with a gamechanger about this a while back. He wanted to be able to use Saki in ranked but his grappling is so poor it would equal an auto loss at the top levels. The was asking for a grappling buff (nothing huge) so that he would be more viable at that level.



My response was that Saki had shown any grappling skills (yet) so buffing him wouldnt be realistic and it would be unfair to rank him over fighters who while not great at grappling have shown more skill there.



My view is that everyone shouldnt be viable at the top levels of ranked. Why? Because people are simply looking to win at that level and will always gravitate toward the best fighters. Now there should always be a group of fighters who are viable at each weight class but everyone shouldnt.

Totally agree Aholbert.
I was more concerned to programming NERFS and there effect on the lower tier fighters when all the balancing is happening in relation to tier 1 fighter vs tier 1 fighter. Example, let's take bantamweight. Cruz/Dillashaw/Garbrandt - excellent head movement. Hypothetically, let's say it gets nerfed along with the jab buffed across the board. Now tier 1 is balanced and the jab buff is nice for all fighters. But the head movement NERF has actually broke the fighters with poor head movement in the division from being defensively able as a result because the nerf was done with 97 head movement in mind. This is what I want to avoid.


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[Thetruth11]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

Totally agree Aholbert.
I was more concerned to programming NERFS and there effect on the lower tier fighters when all the balancing is happening in relation to tier 1 fighter vs tier 1 fighter. Example, let's take bantamweight. Cruz/Dillashaw/Garbrandt - excellent head movement. Hypothetically, let's say it gets nerfed along with the jab buffed across the board. Now tier 1 is balanced and the jab buff is nice for all fighters. But the head movement NERF has actually broke the fighters with poor head movement in the division from being defensively able as a result. This is what I want to avoid.


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

Yeah I tested this with Daniel hooker
I could only sway the 3rd punch of a combination after blocking but with Frankie I could sway the the second

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

[SMOKEZERO]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

Yeah I tested this with Daniel hooker
I could only sway the 3rd punch of a combination after blocking but with Frankie I could sway the the second

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

Fantastic test. Breaking level nerfs is what's the concern.


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[Serengeti1]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

Oh yup your mentally challenged you can't even read never said I've beat up anybody but ok
I know for a fact your fight iq is terrible by your suggestions.
Like I said people who know me seen footage
I'm not going back and forth with you clown.


Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

Let's agree to disagree.

EDIT: you can have the rematch when you're ready tho.

[EarvGotti]

Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

Just for clarity purposes are you guys saying the backstep(left stick) is OP or the back lunge(L1+left stick)?