I know what you mean on both accounts...but theres just something about Mary...err Walker. Can't put my finger on it. College basketball took "it" right in the eye though, lol. Right now, Irving is only great because everyone says he will be, and those experts are dead wrong as often as they get it right, IMO. Walker has at least been proven to be a great leader, nasty in the PnR, and clutch to death. Like you're avy, theres no glaring faults in Kyrie's game, so I'm hoping the pundits are right.
Seems like Williams 'tude will either be a huge positive (Noah) or huge negative (Tyrus Thomas), will be interesting to see which.
Thing about this draft...if you take Irving number one, that makes all the other PG's obsolete, and puts you at Utah's mercy. If they take Kanter, you are stuck with crap value at the four pick, because after Williams and the PG's, the bottom falls out. Taking Williams guarantees you a stud wing, and a very good point guard, although not the best point guard...while taking Kyries guarantees you a very good PG and possibly some dude you could get in 10-15 in any other draft.
Comment