The strongest punishment to side sway spam

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Serengeti1
    MVP
    • Mar 2016
    • 1720

    #196
    Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

    How is anyone saying that a slight stamina tax on head movement would break the game? People block when they have no stamina. They don't use head movement. The best thing to do with literally no stamina is hug block and duck/upper any time your opponent throws anything because of the broken risk/reward.

    GPD... I don't think you understand what is the most effective way to play in the game right now if I'm being honest.

    Comment

    • Phillyboi207
      Banned
      • Apr 2012
      • 3159

      #197
      Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

      Originally posted by Zeta Reticulan1
      I don't think we should be able to use head movement when we are completely gassed, with zero stamina.

      I did say having very low long term stamina and just dodging a couple of punches draining our stamina to the point where we can't respond is silly.
      I continue to think that's silly.

      No one said it's the first line of defense. But it is one line of defense that would undoubtedly be effected by introducing a stamina tax.
      How is that silly? That’s literally how it works in real life

      Hell in real life dudes struggle to keep their guard up when gassed

      Comment

      • johnmangala
        MVP
        • Apr 2016
        • 4525

        #198
        Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

        Originally posted by GameplayDevUFC
        I'm so tempted to add a long term stamina tax that is half that of a landed jab just to shut down the argument, even though it will accomplish nothing.
        It will accomplish what is needed.

        However it isn't the fix all, things like lunges having a delay, and increasing vulerablity on sways would help too.

        It's a part of a wholer picture, it's just one of the main points because it is one of the first things that stick out in terms of realism.

        Comment

        • Zeta Reticulan1
          Banned
          • Sep 2017
          • 471

          #199
          Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

          Originally posted by johnmangala
          You have a complete misunderstand of a stamina tax.

          It does not mean moving your head will automatically enter a stamina deficit in relation to your opponent.

          You can still profit off whiffs like lunges now, just excessive head movement would result in a net tax.

          You know the other lines of defense? Lunges have a stamina tax and you can still lunge with low stamina, blocks have a break meter, etc.

          Head movement irl is tiring, yet in this game it does not tire you and has a great reward in sway counters which none of the other lines of defense have.

          Which make it the best line of defense in this game when it shouldn't be.
          Never said that or thought that lol. It definitely shouldn't be the best line of defense though. And if it currently is in the meta of top players,
          (I have no idea as I mostly play offline) then I agree there needs to be a way to either nerf it or buff the other lines of defense. Just don't want it to be a completely irrelevant option when we have low stamina. Perhaps a slow stamina drain that continues as long as one holds it is appropriate to keep it from being spammed.

          Comment

          • GameplayDevUFC
            Former EA Sports UFC Gameplay Developer
            • Jun 2014
            • 2830

            #200
            Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

            Originally posted by johnmangala
            Back lunges have a stamina tax, so therefore it is punished by the very definition.

            Back sways are as effective with no amount of tiring plus power counters.

            Head movement is more profitable.

            And this is why it's so common and why there are so many complaints about it.
            Back sways evade only one range so they are easily punished with forward moving strikes. They are very dangerous to abuse. And they are vulnerable to body and leg kicks.

            Back lunges move two ranges and evade both body and leg kicks.

            They are way safer to use.

            You cannot compare their risks.

            Comment

            • GameplayDevUFC
              Former EA Sports UFC Gameplay Developer
              • Jun 2014
              • 2830

              #201
              Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

              Originally posted by Serengeti95
              How is anyone saying that a slight stamina tax on head movement would break the game? People block when they have no stamina. They don't use head movement. The best thing to do with literally no stamina is hug block and duck/upper any time your opponent throws anything because of the broken risk/reward.

              GPD... I don't think you understand what is the most effective way to play in the game right now if I'm being honest.
              What on earth are you talking about.

              You just said the most effective defense is to block then sway.

              That's swaying.

              Comment

              • Phillyboi207
                Banned
                • Apr 2012
                • 3159

                #202
                Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                Originally posted by GameplayDevUFC
                I'm so tempted to add a long term stamina tax that is half that of a landed jab just to shut down the argument, even though it will accomplish nothing.
                Half of a whiffed jab on sways that dont dodge anything (aka fishing)and we have a deal.

                *extends handshake*
                Last edited by Phillyboi207; 03-07-2018, 05:35 PM.

                Comment

                • Morgan Monkman
                  North of 60
                  • Apr 2016
                  • 1385

                  #203
                  Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                  Add the stamina tax so i can quit complaining already and start to feel positive about this game please.
                  PSNID: B_A_N_E

                  Comment

                  • johnmangala
                    MVP
                    • Apr 2016
                    • 4525

                    #204
                    Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                    Originally posted by GameplayDevUFC
                    Back sways evade only one range so they are easily punished with forward moving strikes. They are very dangerous to abuse. And they are vulnerable to body and leg kicks.

                    Back lunges move two ranges and evade both body and leg kicks.

                    They are way safer to use.

                    You cannot compare their risks.
                    Flicking back lunges also are around one range if not less. Advanced ones cost even more stamina. This game is about stamina so it is a long term risk.

                    Yeah but with the back sway you are moving away from the opponent moving forward into your counter. That power counter is money. As it should be, it just doesn't come with any tiring.

                    I mean McGregor would pull counter everything if it didn't tire him out.


                    Originally posted by Zeta Reticulan1
                    Never said that or thought that lol. It definitely shouldn't be the best line of defense though. And if it currently is in the meta of top players,
                    (I have no idea as I mostly play offline) then I agree there needs to be a way to either nerf it or buff the other lines of defense. Just don't want it to be a completely irrelevant option when we have low stamina. Perhaps a slow stamina drain that continues as long as one holds it is appropriate to keep it from being spammed.
                    I don't want it to become useless either. I mean I use head movement quite a bit despite what my posts may lead on.

                    It just feels unrealistic imo. I know head movement a tiring aspect of defence and one of the harder ones to master. Yet in this game its the basis of most peoples game, there is something off.

                    Comment

                    • Serengeti1
                      MVP
                      • Mar 2016
                      • 1720

                      #205
                      Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                      Originally posted by GameplayDevUFC
                      What on earth are you talking about.

                      You just said the most effective defense is to block then sway.

                      That's swaying.
                      I'm not sure how many of us are on the same page here. I'm talking about doing a duck/upper as a form of offence. Not defence. Because duck/upper is such an OP form of offence. All I'm saying is that a slight stamina tax on head movement will help. Not hinder. I'm not sure how everyone is picturing these changes but I'll explain how I am. Let's start with what you just said. One sway equals that of a jab. If you have literally no stamina and can only afford to sway once and throw one strike then that's your problem. Are you saying you should be able to sway all over the place in that situation. Like can you explain in better detail why this would break the game so we understand better?

                      In general though... Blocking is the primary defense. Not head movement. That's what I'm really not understanding. But maybe we're not on the same page here?
                      Last edited by Serengeti1; 03-07-2018, 05:44 PM.

                      Comment

                      • tissues250
                        MVP
                        • Apr 2016
                        • 1526

                        #206
                        Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                        Originally posted by Morgan Monkman
                        Add the stamina tax so i can quit complaining already and start to feel positive about this game please.
                        same here but i think, it isn't going to solve the current issue perfectly like GPD said. Need more work on it.

                        Comment

                        • Serengeti1
                          MVP
                          • Mar 2016
                          • 1720

                          #207
                          Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                          Originally posted by tissues250
                          same here but i think, it isn't going to solve the current issue perfectly like GPD said. Need more work on it.
                          For the record... I agree 100%. This isn't at the top of my list in fixing the issue. Tuning the mathematics behind it all is. Vulnerability. Recovery frames. Etc.

                          Comment

                          • ExOicho
                            Banned
                            • Feb 2018
                            • 185

                            #208
                            Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                            Originally posted by Serengeti95
                            I'm not sure how many of us are on the same page here. All I'm saying is that a slight stamina tax on head movement will help. Not hinder. I'm not sure how everyone is picturing these changes but I'll explain how I am. Let's start with what you just said. One sway equals that of a jab. If you have literally no stamina and can only afford to sway once and throw one strike then that's your problem. Are you saying you should be able to sway all over the place in that situation. Like can you explain in better detail why this would break the game so we understand better?

                            In general though... Blocking is the primary defense. Not head movement. That's what I'm really not understanding. But maybe we're not on the same page here?
                            take it one step farther.. footwork SHOULD be the primary defense. it's not even close to deep enough to make a big factor in this game.

                            Comment

                            • GameplayDevUFC
                              Former EA Sports UFC Gameplay Developer
                              • Jun 2014
                              • 2830

                              #209
                              Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                              Originally posted by Serengeti95
                              For the record... I agree 100%. This isn't at the top of my list in fixing the issue. Tuning the mathematics behind it all is. Vulnerability. Recovery frames. Etc.
                              So why is it all anyone talks about?

                              It;s seriously clogging up the thread for something so pointless.

                              Initially people wanted a short and long term stamina drain. When it was obvious that was a horrible idea, now everyone wants a long term drain which will accomplish nothing.

                              Comment

                              • Phillyboi207
                                Banned
                                • Apr 2012
                                • 3159

                                #210
                                Re: The strongest punishment to side sway spam

                                GPD I’m actually curious what you think of the other topic I made regarding stand up.

                                I made sure to provide detailed explanations and gifs.

                                It’s a longer post so I get it if you dont have time right now.

                                Comment

                                Working...