JoshC1977's M16 Sliders

[BZito75]

And are you happy with rushing totals or your qb accuracy? I'm afraid at 50/50 it will be too accurate. Thank you for your quick reply


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[JoshC1977]

Quote: Originally Posted by BZito75

And are you happy with rushing totals or your qb accuracy? I'm afraid at 50/50 it will be too accurate. Thank you for your quick reply

Quite happy....if anything, I am hoping to get CPU QB accuracy up a little bit....numbers have been hovering closer to 60% than 65%.

[BZito75]

Awesome, thank you so much for all your hard work. You rock


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Big Bankhead]

Definitely loving the tighter defense, coming from a defensive guy. Great job like always!

[BZito75]

Loving the new edits josh. Started a new cfm with the Dolphins. I was up 17-3 at the half and the skins started making adjustments and wound up winning 24-20. I got careless with the ball and threw 3 picks. Can't wait to play my next game against the jags tomorrow. Thank you for all your hard work josh. Kudos sir.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Nelly]

hey man, looking for a bit better cpu run game at the moment. using denvers d-line so i'm holding every hb under 3.5 yards per rush. even jamaal or peterson. i know denvers d is dominant but that's a little bit too good imo. any advice? should i directly work with run blocking, or focus on penalty adjustments?

[JoshC1977]

Quote: Originally Posted by Nelly

hey man, looking for a bit better cpu run game at the moment. using denvers d-line so i'm holding every hb under 3.5 yards per rush. even jamaal or peterson. i know denvers d is dominant but that's a little bit too good imo. any advice? should i directly work with run blocking, or focus on penalty adjustments?

Denver's defense in real life is holding opponents to 3.2 ypc.

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...s/2015/opp.htm

Sounds like you're spot-on!

Enjoy!

Edit: For clarity, I did not intend this as a glib answer. But the goal is to have ratings mean something. Your team's performance is dead-on where they should be and I am guessing that if you were using my Saints and their atrocious defense, you would be giving up a lot more yardage.

[gman2774]

Just an observation. Crazy how much auto subs changes overall gameplay. Played using the 60/80 and noticed the differences you described Josh. The gameplay did seem easier in my very small sample size. For fun, I went back and left auto subs at default. 60/80 in MM and 50/50 in CFM. Gameplay difference was even more extreme. Not in a good way. Tackling was very stiff meaning little broken tackles. Suction blocking was back in full effect and my d line men were being blown of the line. Crazy how just a small adjustment in CFM auto subs from 60/80 to 50/50 makes such a huge adjustment.